Crypto Futures Orders: Market, Limit and Conditional Orders
Understand futures order execution, post-only and reduce-only instructions. Check unfilled orders, taker fees and the difference between triggering and filling.
A perpetual futures contract is a derivatives product designed to track an underlying crypto market without a fixed expiry date. Exchanges use mechanisms such as funding and mark price to manage the relationship between the perpetual contract and the reference market.
Connect the displayed numbers to execution rules and the limits of public calculations.
Understand futures order execution, post-only and reduce-only instructions. Check unfilled orders, taker fees and the difference between triggering and filling.
Compare isolated, cross and portfolio margin. Understand initial and maintenance requirements with a hypothetical calculation and account-specific limits.
Learn why chart and liquidation prices differ, why stops may not prevent liquidation, and how to investigate a liquidation using account records.
Unlike a dated futures contract, a perpetual contract normally has no scheduled expiry. A trader can hold a position while margin requirements are met, but leverage means adverse price moves can trigger liquidation. Funding payments are exchanged periodically according to the exchange rules and published rate.
Major derivatives venues publish a mark price separately from the last traded price. The mark price is commonly used in unrealized P&L and liquidation-related logic to reduce the effect of a single abnormal trade. The exact construction differs by exchange, so this site stores the exchange-published mark price instead of inventing a universal formula.
A trading fee is charged for an execution under the exchange fee schedule. Funding is a separate periodic transfer associated with perpetual positions. A positive rate generally means longs pay shorts at the funding event; a negative rate generally reverses that direction. Funding intervals and rate caps can differ by venue and instrument.
Ten-times leverage does not make the asset move ten times more. It lets a smaller amount of initial margin control a larger notional position. That also reduces the room available before margin requirements are breached, which is why liquidation risk grows as leverage rises.
Exchanges can apply different maintenance-margin rates and leverage limits as notional exposure grows. For that reason, a liquidation calculator that uses one MMR for every position size can be wrong. HaesunCheck only auto-selects a tier when an official public endpoint exposes the necessary data.
In cross or portfolio-style margin modes, wallet balance, other positions, unrealized P&L, collateral haircuts and exchange-specific rules can affect margin health. A public calculator that does not know those account variables should present an estimate, not an “exact liquidation price.”